| 2010 NEWS & UPDATES ARCHIVE |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Copyright 2011: American Federation of Government Employees Local 918. All rights reserved. |
January 9, 2010
| AFGE Local 918-FPS Warning to Our Membership Use of assigned government-owned law enforcement vehicle and exercise of authority off-federal property could be detrimental to your career |
On January 7, 2009, an FPS Inspector was arrested by investigators with the FPS Policy Compliance Unit and ICE Office of Professional Responsibility. The Inspector
had been federally indicted on seven misdemeanor charges for violations of Section 242 of Title 18, U.S. Code. In summary, the Inspector had conducted traffic stops
off-federal property while operating an assigned FPS law enforcement vehicle. AFGE Local 918-FPS is not familiar with the merits or specifics of the government’s case
however, based upon information as we know it now, we believe the Inspector's actions, when properly and competently presented at trial, would tend to exculpate him
from the alleged criminal elements and hopefully lead to acquittal or dismissal of charges. This officer will get his day in court and of course is presumed to be
innocent.
This message is not intended to get involved with the particularities or advocacy of this individual’s case. It is intended to point out a very significant detail pertaining to
this arrest that apparently has potential to impact to all FPS Law enforcement officers who operate government-owned vehciles, especially marked police units, whether
on duty, during official travel or even during routine Home-To-Work commute. From casually examining the indictment, it appears, that for at least one U.S. Attorney's
Office, in one federal court district, that at least one grand jury saw that the mere presence of that marked police vehicle - especially with the accompaniment of an on-
or off-duty officer bearing the accouterments of FPS police authority - uniform, badge, weapon, vehicle emergency equipment (lights, PA, siren) - at location other
than federal property with public interaction (traffic stop or related driving incident) as constituting that officer's and vehicle's presence as being within the meaning of
"color of law" as applied within the cited statute. The Grand Jury saw it appropriate to issue a seven count misdemeanor indictment decreeing that the alleged conduct
of that officer rose to the level of being inherently criminal and that such conduct was also allegedly a deprivation of civil rights under the color of law. Apparently the
nature of the alleged actions and the postured FPS authority cemented the color of law perception.
AFGE Local 918-FPS is issuing a warning to all of FPS law enforcement membership who operate government-owned law enforcement vehicles: You are
driving a marked FPS Police vehicle that is also liveried with an 800 number that for all practical purposes has become the "drop a dime" line for both legitimate and
artificial public complaints. If you cover, deface or remove the 800 number you are violating policy and can be disciplined. You are in the public eye. Also, the agency
is disastrously and historically inconsistent in how it establishes, enforces and administers policy concerning off-property (on and off duty) enforcement/assistance
expectations and obligations of its officers when encountering public summoning (hailing) incidents or those that develop on view.
FPS at FLETC and some of the HQ and Regional Leadership - with either only a tacit wink and a nod, or a softly spoken verbal nudge - will tell you to get involved in
everything that you see or encounter while representing the agency off property. They won't give you the appropriate authorizing policy, MOU/MOA, state certification,
deputization or peace officer recognition that would tend to guide and support (and likely indemnify) such good faith actions as being within the lawful constructs of off-
property empowerment apparently intended within the framework of Title 40, U.S. Code, Section 1315 despite the fact that many States and municipalities have granted
some type of law enforcement authority to FPS law enforcement officers.
You are on your own! Thus you are potentially a highly visible public target that the agency has the option to either back up or turn its back upon, subject to their
arbitrary discretion. Your actions potentially constitute your exposure to personal liability. We each must follow orders and act within the law and in accordance with
moral conscience. You must make your own decisions about these types of things. Just remember, your actions, righteous or reckless, will be in the public eye.
Assume that you are being videotaped and maintain your professionalism at all times. Get professional liability insurance, and document any verbal or implied policies
by recapping them back to the issuing supervisor.
Home-To-Work authorization is a privilege and not a right. Do not abuse it. On the same note, it is not mandatory to accept a vehicle for Home-To-Work travel. If you
accept this authorization, you are assuming the risks.
AFGE Local 918-FPS will be seeking to address the related issues with the Agency and through our Congressional contacts. FPS needs to enter into agreements with
State and local governments, to the extent possible, to clearly define the authority of FPS law enforcement officers in localities throughout the country and to develop
Regional policies on the exercise of any local authority granted by a State or municipality. Otherwise, FPS should consider issuing unmarked vehicles to all FPS law
enforcement employees.
In addition, AFGE Local 918-FPS finds the manner in which the arrest was accomplished to be abhorrent. The actions of the FPS Policy Compliance Unit and the ICE
Office of Professional Responsibility in effecting the arrest were above and beyond what were necessary for these misdemeanor allegations. There was ample
opportunity to handle the matter in a more appropriate manner rather than take actions which clearly served only to embarrass and demean the FPS employee. If you
have questions or concerns about the use of authority and government vehicles in your area, you should contact your supervisor and/or Local 918 shop steward or
Regional Vice-President.
Stay Safe!
had been federally indicted on seven misdemeanor charges for violations of Section 242 of Title 18, U.S. Code. In summary, the Inspector had conducted traffic stops
off-federal property while operating an assigned FPS law enforcement vehicle. AFGE Local 918-FPS is not familiar with the merits or specifics of the government’s case
however, based upon information as we know it now, we believe the Inspector's actions, when properly and competently presented at trial, would tend to exculpate him
from the alleged criminal elements and hopefully lead to acquittal or dismissal of charges. This officer will get his day in court and of course is presumed to be
innocent.
This message is not intended to get involved with the particularities or advocacy of this individual’s case. It is intended to point out a very significant detail pertaining to
this arrest that apparently has potential to impact to all FPS Law enforcement officers who operate government-owned vehciles, especially marked police units, whether
on duty, during official travel or even during routine Home-To-Work commute. From casually examining the indictment, it appears, that for at least one U.S. Attorney's
Office, in one federal court district, that at least one grand jury saw that the mere presence of that marked police vehicle - especially with the accompaniment of an on-
or off-duty officer bearing the accouterments of FPS police authority - uniform, badge, weapon, vehicle emergency equipment (lights, PA, siren) - at location other
than federal property with public interaction (traffic stop or related driving incident) as constituting that officer's and vehicle's presence as being within the meaning of
"color of law" as applied within the cited statute. The Grand Jury saw it appropriate to issue a seven count misdemeanor indictment decreeing that the alleged conduct
of that officer rose to the level of being inherently criminal and that such conduct was also allegedly a deprivation of civil rights under the color of law. Apparently the
nature of the alleged actions and the postured FPS authority cemented the color of law perception.
AFGE Local 918-FPS is issuing a warning to all of FPS law enforcement membership who operate government-owned law enforcement vehicles: You are
driving a marked FPS Police vehicle that is also liveried with an 800 number that for all practical purposes has become the "drop a dime" line for both legitimate and
artificial public complaints. If you cover, deface or remove the 800 number you are violating policy and can be disciplined. You are in the public eye. Also, the agency
is disastrously and historically inconsistent in how it establishes, enforces and administers policy concerning off-property (on and off duty) enforcement/assistance
expectations and obligations of its officers when encountering public summoning (hailing) incidents or those that develop on view.
FPS at FLETC and some of the HQ and Regional Leadership - with either only a tacit wink and a nod, or a softly spoken verbal nudge - will tell you to get involved in
everything that you see or encounter while representing the agency off property. They won't give you the appropriate authorizing policy, MOU/MOA, state certification,
deputization or peace officer recognition that would tend to guide and support (and likely indemnify) such good faith actions as being within the lawful constructs of off-
property empowerment apparently intended within the framework of Title 40, U.S. Code, Section 1315 despite the fact that many States and municipalities have granted
some type of law enforcement authority to FPS law enforcement officers.
You are on your own! Thus you are potentially a highly visible public target that the agency has the option to either back up or turn its back upon, subject to their
arbitrary discretion. Your actions potentially constitute your exposure to personal liability. We each must follow orders and act within the law and in accordance with
moral conscience. You must make your own decisions about these types of things. Just remember, your actions, righteous or reckless, will be in the public eye.
Assume that you are being videotaped and maintain your professionalism at all times. Get professional liability insurance, and document any verbal or implied policies
by recapping them back to the issuing supervisor.
Home-To-Work authorization is a privilege and not a right. Do not abuse it. On the same note, it is not mandatory to accept a vehicle for Home-To-Work travel. If you
accept this authorization, you are assuming the risks.
AFGE Local 918-FPS will be seeking to address the related issues with the Agency and through our Congressional contacts. FPS needs to enter into agreements with
State and local governments, to the extent possible, to clearly define the authority of FPS law enforcement officers in localities throughout the country and to develop
Regional policies on the exercise of any local authority granted by a State or municipality. Otherwise, FPS should consider issuing unmarked vehicles to all FPS law
enforcement employees.
In addition, AFGE Local 918-FPS finds the manner in which the arrest was accomplished to be abhorrent. The actions of the FPS Policy Compliance Unit and the ICE
Office of Professional Responsibility in effecting the arrest were above and beyond what were necessary for these misdemeanor allegations. There was ample
opportunity to handle the matter in a more appropriate manner rather than take actions which clearly served only to embarrass and demean the FPS employee. If you
have questions or concerns about the use of authority and government vehicles in your area, you should contact your supervisor and/or Local 918 shop steward or
Regional Vice-President.
Stay Safe!
February 1, 2010
| Statement by AFGE Local 918-FPS President David Wright regarding President Obama's 2011 Budget Proposal |
On behalf of the men and women who protect federal buildings across this country, I am shocked that the Obama Administration's budget includes no additional funding
for the Federal Protective Service - one of the nation's most important homeland security agencies. In past three years, the GAO has come out with no less than four
reports detailing the impact of insufficient funding and manpower and the vulnerability it has created in our national homeland security safety net.
Congress has held hearing after hearing on the situation and the issue has been widely reported in the press. Yet the agency remains underfunded, understaffed and
unimproved in any real way. Even worse, the Administration is proposing to eliminate the minimum staffing standards established by Congress. This could signal an
effort to reduce the size of this agency.
We view this as an irresponsible decision. Federal buildings are, and always will be first line targets for international and homegrown terrorists such as Timothy
McVeigh. If the terror trials are held in NY, the FPS will have a major responsibililty for overall security. If something were to happen there, it might well be traceable to
this decision.
We are certain that Congress will not support this decision and provide the resources necessary to secure the nation's federal buildings. We urge President Obama to
reconsider and support sufficient funds for the FPS to perform its mission.
for the Federal Protective Service - one of the nation's most important homeland security agencies. In past three years, the GAO has come out with no less than four
reports detailing the impact of insufficient funding and manpower and the vulnerability it has created in our national homeland security safety net.
Congress has held hearing after hearing on the situation and the issue has been widely reported in the press. Yet the agency remains underfunded, understaffed and
unimproved in any real way. Even worse, the Administration is proposing to eliminate the minimum staffing standards established by Congress. This could signal an
effort to reduce the size of this agency.
We view this as an irresponsible decision. Federal buildings are, and always will be first line targets for international and homegrown terrorists such as Timothy
McVeigh. If the terror trials are held in NY, the FPS will have a major responsibililty for overall security. If something were to happen there, it might well be traceable to
this decision.
We are certain that Congress will not support this decision and provide the resources necessary to secure the nation's federal buildings. We urge President Obama to
reconsider and support sufficient funds for the FPS to perform its mission.
February 1, 2010
| FEDERAL EMPLOYEE UNION RESPONDS TO OBAMA BUDGET AFGE Disappointed with Smallest Pay Raise since 1973, Applauds Pay Parity |
(WASHINGTON) – The American Federation of Government Employees today responded to President Obama’s 2011 budget proposal, including a 1.4% pay raise for
civilian and military employees. “We are going to work very hard with Congress to adjust the 1.4% pay raise upward,” said AFGE National President John Gage. “While
we are pleased that the administration recognizes the importance of pay parity between civilian employees and the military, a 1.4% pay raise will do nothing to close the
remaining pay gap between federal and non-federal salaries. We’re talking about a pay raise that will take effect an entire year from now. Although the economy is still
weak today, all signs point to a recovery by 2011, and by that time prices will be higher, health insurance premiums will be much, much higher, and labor markets will
have tightened.”
The 2011 budget goes a long way to take care of our nation’s veterans and our retirees. “We are relieved that President Obama recognizes how understaffed the
Social Security Administration is. This increase will go a long way in reducing the unacceptable backlog in handling and processing disability claims, appeals and
hearings that has been created by years of understaffing, the aging baby boomers and the economic recession,” continued Gage.
AFGE lauded the decision to increase Veterans Administration funding. “For too long, the unpredictability and inadequacy of the VA’s discretionary funding process has
had an adverse impact on the care of our nation’s veterans. With an increase in funding of 20% since 2009, and with advanced appropriations, the 2011 budget honors
veterans by fortifying the world-class medical care they deserve,” said J. David Cox, AFGE national secretary-treasurer and former VA nurse.
“We are also pleased that President Obama recognizes the need to strengthen the federal prison system, including a significant increase in full-time employee
positions. The imminent threat that understaffing has posed to federal correctional officers, prisoners and the communities that surround the prisons have become a
dangerous matter of life or death. Proper staffing will help alleviate the dire situation in our federal prisons,” said Gage.
The 2011 budget touches on the need to control contractor costs. “We are as committed to eliminating waste, fraud and abuse with the federal government as anyone.
However, many federal agencies have not yet recovered from the onslaught they experienced during the past administration. We are eager for more defined guidance
on the insourcing of government jobs. Over the past decade far too many American tax dollars were wasted away through sole-source contracts and misguided
personnel systems. The boost in the acquisition workforce in the 2011 budget points to a desire for more government efficiency which would allow agencies to rein in
their budgets while still hiring more federal employees,” said Gage.
The president’s budget also proposes increases for the EPA, the FDA and for OSHA. “We commend the essential and necessary strengthening of our nation’s
regulatory agencies. With additional staff, the right people at the head of these agencies and sufficient resources, these agencies will be better able to fulfill their
missions of protecting the American public from bacteria outbreaks in our food chain; on the job injuries and deaths; and environmental danger. Regulation in these
vital areas can only preserve the health and well being of our country.”
However, the proposed budget includes no additional funding for the Federal Protective Service - one of the nation's most important homeland security agencies. “In
past three years, the GAO has come out with no less than four reports detailing the impact of insufficient funding and manpower and the vulnerability it has created in
our national homeland security safety net. The agency remains underfunded, understaffed and unimproved in any real way. We hope that Congress will provide the
necessary funding to secure the nation's federal buildings,” concluded Gage.
civilian and military employees. “We are going to work very hard with Congress to adjust the 1.4% pay raise upward,” said AFGE National President John Gage. “While
we are pleased that the administration recognizes the importance of pay parity between civilian employees and the military, a 1.4% pay raise will do nothing to close the
remaining pay gap between federal and non-federal salaries. We’re talking about a pay raise that will take effect an entire year from now. Although the economy is still
weak today, all signs point to a recovery by 2011, and by that time prices will be higher, health insurance premiums will be much, much higher, and labor markets will
have tightened.”
The 2011 budget goes a long way to take care of our nation’s veterans and our retirees. “We are relieved that President Obama recognizes how understaffed the
Social Security Administration is. This increase will go a long way in reducing the unacceptable backlog in handling and processing disability claims, appeals and
hearings that has been created by years of understaffing, the aging baby boomers and the economic recession,” continued Gage.
AFGE lauded the decision to increase Veterans Administration funding. “For too long, the unpredictability and inadequacy of the VA’s discretionary funding process has
had an adverse impact on the care of our nation’s veterans. With an increase in funding of 20% since 2009, and with advanced appropriations, the 2011 budget honors
veterans by fortifying the world-class medical care they deserve,” said J. David Cox, AFGE national secretary-treasurer and former VA nurse.
“We are also pleased that President Obama recognizes the need to strengthen the federal prison system, including a significant increase in full-time employee
positions. The imminent threat that understaffing has posed to federal correctional officers, prisoners and the communities that surround the prisons have become a
dangerous matter of life or death. Proper staffing will help alleviate the dire situation in our federal prisons,” said Gage.
The 2011 budget touches on the need to control contractor costs. “We are as committed to eliminating waste, fraud and abuse with the federal government as anyone.
However, many federal agencies have not yet recovered from the onslaught they experienced during the past administration. We are eager for more defined guidance
on the insourcing of government jobs. Over the past decade far too many American tax dollars were wasted away through sole-source contracts and misguided
personnel systems. The boost in the acquisition workforce in the 2011 budget points to a desire for more government efficiency which would allow agencies to rein in
their budgets while still hiring more federal employees,” said Gage.
The president’s budget also proposes increases for the EPA, the FDA and for OSHA. “We commend the essential and necessary strengthening of our nation’s
regulatory agencies. With additional staff, the right people at the head of these agencies and sufficient resources, these agencies will be better able to fulfill their
missions of protecting the American public from bacteria outbreaks in our food chain; on the job injuries and deaths; and environmental danger. Regulation in these
vital areas can only preserve the health and well being of our country.”
However, the proposed budget includes no additional funding for the Federal Protective Service - one of the nation's most important homeland security agencies. “In
past three years, the GAO has come out with no less than four reports detailing the impact of insufficient funding and manpower and the vulnerability it has created in
our national homeland security safety net. The agency remains underfunded, understaffed and unimproved in any real way. We hope that Congress will provide the
necessary funding to secure the nation's federal buildings,” concluded Gage.
February 1, 2010
| SAMBA Employee Benevolent Fund Special Open Enrollment Period NPPD: Feb 1 to April 1, 2010 |
The SAMBA Employee Benevolent Fund pays an immediate death benefit of $17,500. There is a special open enrollment period for NPPD employees from February 1 to
April 1, 2010. Visit sambaplans.com for more information.
April 1, 2010. Visit sambaplans.com for more information.
March 12, 2010
| Oversight Hearing to Examine Federal Employee Workplace Safety and Security Local 918 President David Wright to testify |
On Tuesday, March 16, 2010 at 2:00 p.m. in room 2154 of the Rayburn House Office Building the Subcommittee on Federal Workforce, Postal Service and the District
of Columbia will hold a hearing to examine federal employee workplace safety and security.
In the wake of recent attacks on the Internal Revenue Service building in Austin, Texas and the January shooting in the lobby of the Las Vegas federal courthouse a
pressing need exists to evaluate federal and postal office security standards and protocols.
The upcoming hearing will evaluate the status of and responsibility for agency and postal building security assessments, as well as the level of physical and perimeter
security. Further, the hearing will focus on how threat communication is disseminated across offices and will assess the level of coordination between federal and local
law enforcement.
For further information regarding the hearing, please contact the Subcommittee Professional Staff, Jill Crissman, at ext - 55147
Connect to the Live Webcast This link will be available on the day of the hearing.
of Columbia will hold a hearing to examine federal employee workplace safety and security.
In the wake of recent attacks on the Internal Revenue Service building in Austin, Texas and the January shooting in the lobby of the Las Vegas federal courthouse a
pressing need exists to evaluate federal and postal office security standards and protocols.
The upcoming hearing will evaluate the status of and responsibility for agency and postal building security assessments, as well as the level of physical and perimeter
security. Further, the hearing will focus on how threat communication is disseminated across offices and will assess the level of coordination between federal and local
law enforcement.
For further information regarding the hearing, please contact the Subcommittee Professional Staff, Jill Crissman, at ext - 55147
Connect to the Live Webcast This link will be available on the day of the hearing.
March 11, 2010
| Washington Post: Use of private security guards at government buildings comes under scrutiny |
The Washington Post has reported on the use of contract security guards at federal facilities and the upcoming hearing to examine feral employee workplace safety
and security. The article can be found at the Washington Post website or by clicking here.
and security. The article can be found at the Washington Post website or by clicking here.
March 16, 2010
| FEDERAL PROTECTIVE SERVICE UNION TELLS CONGRESS AGENCY IS IN DISARRAY AFGE Local 918-FPS Testifies Before House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform |
(WASHINGTON) – Today, David Wright, president of the union representing Federal Protective Service (FPS) personnel, testified before Congress on the chronic
challenges facing the agency, including dramatic staff shortages and an undermanaged, under-trained contract workforce. In addition to serving as president of the
American Federation of Government Employees Local 918, Wright has been an employee of the Federal Protective Service for 23 years.
Over the past two years, the FPS has been examined six times by the Government Accountability Office (GAO). In each study, GAO concluded that the agency is
unable to fulfill its mission because of internal challenges. The union is now calling on Congress to act to protect the employees and facilities of the federal government.
“The recent attacks on the Pentagon, an IRS building in Austin, and federal courthouses in Las Vegas and Kansas City serve as wake up calls to both the
administration and the Congress that the time for discussion, studies and years of reports is over,” said Wright. “Action is required now, not after the next major terrorist
attack.”
The Federal Protective Service is crippled by a severe lack of trained personnel. In the wake of the Oklahoma City bombing, the federal government determined that a
minimum of 1,480 FPS personnel were necessary to perform the agency’s mission. In the 15 years since that terrorist attack, the agency has never reached that level
of personnel. In fact, since the development of the Department of Homeland Security in 2003, the total number of inspectors and police officer positions has dropped
from 1,017 to 830 – a reduction of over 18 percent.
Congress recognized the need for a robust security workforce when it congressionally mandated that FPS have no fewer than 1,200 fulltime equivalent staff and 900
fulltime equivalent police officers, inspectors, area commanders, and special agents in the FY2010 Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act. At its current
staffing levels the agency fails both of these standards.
“The current staffing levels make it impossible for FPS personnel to securely protect federal buildings and employees. The agency cuts mean that we are no longer
able to operate on a 24 hour patrol basis, even when protecting high level security facilities,” said Wright. “Unfortunately, terrorists and criminals don’t work banker’s
hours, not having around the clock surveillance leaves serious gaps in our ability to provide security.”
The agency has attempted to fill its staffing gap with contract guards, but this desperate measure only aggravates the problem. The number of contract guards
monitoring federal facilities has exploded over the past decade, from 5,000 in 2001 to 15,000 in 2009. However, these contract guards lack the necessary training and
authority to effectively protect high level security targets. “While the agency has exponentially increased the level of contract guards, it cut FPS staff. The result is that
there simply are not enough FPS personnel to train or supervise the contract guards.” The gaps in training were revealed in a GAO test where investigators were able
to enter federal facilities with bomb making materials.
“In order to overcome the many challenges facing the agency, it is essential that FPS rely on frontline leadership to deliver both law enforcement and security services
to properly protect Federal workplaces,” Wright said. Wright urged the Committee to increase the number of Series 0083 FPS Police officers as a way of restoring the
agency’s ability to adequately perform contract oversight. The Union is also urging Congress to change the existing funding structure and appropriate the funding
necessary to secure federal facilities – as opposed to the current fee funding scheme.
“Federal employees deserve the right to feel safe at work,” said Wright. “As threats against federal employees and federal buildings continue, it is essential that the
administration and the Congress take all steps necessary to ensure their protection.”
A recording of the hearing may be viewed on our Videos page.
challenges facing the agency, including dramatic staff shortages and an undermanaged, under-trained contract workforce. In addition to serving as president of the
American Federation of Government Employees Local 918, Wright has been an employee of the Federal Protective Service for 23 years.
Over the past two years, the FPS has been examined six times by the Government Accountability Office (GAO). In each study, GAO concluded that the agency is
unable to fulfill its mission because of internal challenges. The union is now calling on Congress to act to protect the employees and facilities of the federal government.
“The recent attacks on the Pentagon, an IRS building in Austin, and federal courthouses in Las Vegas and Kansas City serve as wake up calls to both the
administration and the Congress that the time for discussion, studies and years of reports is over,” said Wright. “Action is required now, not after the next major terrorist
attack.”
The Federal Protective Service is crippled by a severe lack of trained personnel. In the wake of the Oklahoma City bombing, the federal government determined that a
minimum of 1,480 FPS personnel were necessary to perform the agency’s mission. In the 15 years since that terrorist attack, the agency has never reached that level
of personnel. In fact, since the development of the Department of Homeland Security in 2003, the total number of inspectors and police officer positions has dropped
from 1,017 to 830 – a reduction of over 18 percent.
Congress recognized the need for a robust security workforce when it congressionally mandated that FPS have no fewer than 1,200 fulltime equivalent staff and 900
fulltime equivalent police officers, inspectors, area commanders, and special agents in the FY2010 Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act. At its current
staffing levels the agency fails both of these standards.
“The current staffing levels make it impossible for FPS personnel to securely protect federal buildings and employees. The agency cuts mean that we are no longer
able to operate on a 24 hour patrol basis, even when protecting high level security facilities,” said Wright. “Unfortunately, terrorists and criminals don’t work banker’s
hours, not having around the clock surveillance leaves serious gaps in our ability to provide security.”
The agency has attempted to fill its staffing gap with contract guards, but this desperate measure only aggravates the problem. The number of contract guards
monitoring federal facilities has exploded over the past decade, from 5,000 in 2001 to 15,000 in 2009. However, these contract guards lack the necessary training and
authority to effectively protect high level security targets. “While the agency has exponentially increased the level of contract guards, it cut FPS staff. The result is that
there simply are not enough FPS personnel to train or supervise the contract guards.” The gaps in training were revealed in a GAO test where investigators were able
to enter federal facilities with bomb making materials.
“In order to overcome the many challenges facing the agency, it is essential that FPS rely on frontline leadership to deliver both law enforcement and security services
to properly protect Federal workplaces,” Wright said. Wright urged the Committee to increase the number of Series 0083 FPS Police officers as a way of restoring the
agency’s ability to adequately perform contract oversight. The Union is also urging Congress to change the existing funding structure and appropriate the funding
necessary to secure federal facilities – as opposed to the current fee funding scheme.
“Federal employees deserve the right to feel safe at work,” said Wright. “As threats against federal employees and federal buildings continue, it is essential that the
administration and the Congress take all steps necessary to ensure their protection.”
A recording of the hearing may be viewed on our Videos page.
April 8, 2010
| House Homeland Security Committee to Hold Hearing on FPS Hearing to examine if the federalization of guards would improve security at critical federal facilities |
On Wednesday, April 14, 2010 at 10am EST at 311 Cannon House Office Building, the full committee of the House of Representatives Homeland Security Committee will
hold a hearing on the Federal Protective Service. The hearing, entitled “Federal Protective Service: Would Federalization of Guards Improve Security at Critical
Facilities?” will examine continuing challenges the Federal Protective Service faces in securing critical government facilities, and the potential for federalization of
contract security guards to address serious security lapses GAO identified at facilities where contract guards stand post. Members will also have an opportunity to
question witnesses regarding the status of FPS’ transition from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to the National Protection and Programs Directorate
(NPPD).
Witnesses scheduled to appear include:
Gary Schenkel, Director, Federal Protective Service, Department of Homeland Security
Mark Goldstein, Director, Physical Infrastructure Issues, Government Accountability Office
Clark Kent Ervin, Director, Homeland Security Program, The Aspen Institute
There will be a webcast of this hearing. The webcast is available live, during a hearing, by clicking here
hold a hearing on the Federal Protective Service. The hearing, entitled “Federal Protective Service: Would Federalization of Guards Improve Security at Critical
Facilities?” will examine continuing challenges the Federal Protective Service faces in securing critical government facilities, and the potential for federalization of
contract security guards to address serious security lapses GAO identified at facilities where contract guards stand post. Members will also have an opportunity to
question witnesses regarding the status of FPS’ transition from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to the National Protection and Programs Directorate
(NPPD).
Witnesses scheduled to appear include:
Gary Schenkel, Director, Federal Protective Service, Department of Homeland Security
Mark Goldstein, Director, Physical Infrastructure Issues, Government Accountability Office
Clark Kent Ervin, Director, Homeland Security Program, The Aspen Institute
There will be a webcast of this hearing. The webcast is available live, during a hearing, by clicking here
guard force. The report, “Federal Protective Service’s Contract Guard Program Requires More Oversight and Reassessment of Use of Contract Guards” (GAO-10-
341), is the final report and a follow up to preliminary testimony the GAO gave last July showing many of the same problems.
The GAO review was requested by Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Chairman Joe Lieberman, ID-Conn., Ranking Member Susan
Collins, R-Me., Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management, the Federal Workforce, and the District of Columbia Chairman Daniel Akaka, D-Hawaii,
Ranking Member George Voinovich, R-Ohio, and several House members. The Senators are actively working on legislation to reform and modernize the FPS and
expect to introduce it later this month.
Tuesday’s report found that none of the contractors the GAO reviewed had met training or certification requirements for their guards. Additionally, not all contract
guards have received required training on x-ray machines or metal detectors at the posts they are in charge of protecting.
“While it has taken some steps forward in recent months, the Federal Protective Service continues to be an agency in crisis,” said Lieberman. “I am particularly alarmed
by information in this most recent GAO report that, in over half of the tests of building security FPS recently conducted themselves, some guards failed to identify
prohibited items, such as guns, knives and fake bombs. I will continue to work with my colleagues to address these, and other, issues with legislation to modernize FPS
that we expect to introduce later this month. In the meantime, we can take a step in the right direction by augmenting the FPS budget to provide the agency with
additional flexibility and manpower, as I asked the Budget Committee to consider as it works on the FY11 budget.”
“Once again, a GAO probe into the workings of the Federal Protective Service (FPS) has revealed alarming security lapses,” said Collins. “Investigators gave FPS a
failing grade when it comes to managing guard contractors who protect federal buildings. The GAO review found that seven out of seven selected guard contractors in
a random sampling were not in compliance with mandatory training and certification requirements—that’s a 100 percent failure rate. Instead of terminating or taking
other actions against these contractors, FPS incredibly exercised its option to extend all seven contracts.
“This new report notes that follow-up tests have produced dismal results: In more than half of the 53 security checks FPS conducted, guards failed to identify concealed
guns and knives. And although FSP has revised its x-ray and magnetometer training, all guards won’t be fully trained until December 2010—even though they are
currently working to guard federal facilities.
“Every day, FPS officers and the agency’s contract security guards protect nearly 9,000 federal facilities, the people who work in them, and the visitors who come to
them to access vital government services. This is no way to protect federal employees and buildings in post-9/11 America. FPS is a system in dire need of
improvements, and I look forward to working with Senator Lieberman to resolve these problems.”
“I have long been concerned that FPS employs too few Federal officers overseeing too many contractors who are not provided the needed training and oversight,” said
Akaka. “In one region, GAO found that FPS had not provided training to roughly 1,500 contract guards since 2004. That is unacceptable. FPS safeguards the millions
of Federal employees and members of the public who enter Federal buildings every day, a responsibility that must be taken seriously. It is long past time to address
critical gaps in training and contractor oversight at FPS.”
“This GAO report paints a troubling picture of operational challenges, management problems and poor coordination inside and outside of FPS, despite its recent
realignment within DHS. I am particularly disturbed to learn that contract guards are not receiving the training and certifications they need to secure our federal
buildings and protect our employees,” Voinovich said. “I will continue to work with my colleagues to address these critical issues and ensure that FPS isn’t marginalized
at DHS at the expense of public safety and employee morale.”
341), is the final report and a follow up to preliminary testimony the GAO gave last July showing many of the same problems.
The GAO review was requested by Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Chairman Joe Lieberman, ID-Conn., Ranking Member Susan
Collins, R-Me., Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management, the Federal Workforce, and the District of Columbia Chairman Daniel Akaka, D-Hawaii,
Ranking Member George Voinovich, R-Ohio, and several House members. The Senators are actively working on legislation to reform and modernize the FPS and
expect to introduce it later this month.
Tuesday’s report found that none of the contractors the GAO reviewed had met training or certification requirements for their guards. Additionally, not all contract
guards have received required training on x-ray machines or metal detectors at the posts they are in charge of protecting.
“While it has taken some steps forward in recent months, the Federal Protective Service continues to be an agency in crisis,” said Lieberman. “I am particularly alarmed
by information in this most recent GAO report that, in over half of the tests of building security FPS recently conducted themselves, some guards failed to identify
prohibited items, such as guns, knives and fake bombs. I will continue to work with my colleagues to address these, and other, issues with legislation to modernize FPS
that we expect to introduce later this month. In the meantime, we can take a step in the right direction by augmenting the FPS budget to provide the agency with
additional flexibility and manpower, as I asked the Budget Committee to consider as it works on the FY11 budget.”
“Once again, a GAO probe into the workings of the Federal Protective Service (FPS) has revealed alarming security lapses,” said Collins. “Investigators gave FPS a
failing grade when it comes to managing guard contractors who protect federal buildings. The GAO review found that seven out of seven selected guard contractors in
a random sampling were not in compliance with mandatory training and certification requirements—that’s a 100 percent failure rate. Instead of terminating or taking
other actions against these contractors, FPS incredibly exercised its option to extend all seven contracts.
“This new report notes that follow-up tests have produced dismal results: In more than half of the 53 security checks FPS conducted, guards failed to identify concealed
guns and knives. And although FSP has revised its x-ray and magnetometer training, all guards won’t be fully trained until December 2010—even though they are
currently working to guard federal facilities.
“Every day, FPS officers and the agency’s contract security guards protect nearly 9,000 federal facilities, the people who work in them, and the visitors who come to
them to access vital government services. This is no way to protect federal employees and buildings in post-9/11 America. FPS is a system in dire need of
improvements, and I look forward to working with Senator Lieberman to resolve these problems.”
“I have long been concerned that FPS employs too few Federal officers overseeing too many contractors who are not provided the needed training and oversight,” said
Akaka. “In one region, GAO found that FPS had not provided training to roughly 1,500 contract guards since 2004. That is unacceptable. FPS safeguards the millions
of Federal employees and members of the public who enter Federal buildings every day, a responsibility that must be taken seriously. It is long past time to address
critical gaps in training and contractor oversight at FPS.”
“This GAO report paints a troubling picture of operational challenges, management problems and poor coordination inside and outside of FPS, despite its recent
realignment within DHS. I am particularly disturbed to learn that contract guards are not receiving the training and certifications they need to secure our federal
buildings and protect our employees,” Voinovich said. “I will continue to work with my colleagues to address these critical issues and ensure that FPS isn’t marginalized
at DHS at the expense of public safety and employee morale.”
| Senate Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee Troubled by Problems at FPS Committee releases statement, commits to introduce FPS Reform legislation his month |
April 12, 2010
| Senate Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee Press Release PROBLEMS PERSIST AT FEDERAL PROTECTIVE SERVICE Training, Certification Issues Continue to be Widespread |
April 14, 2010
| FPS Union Expresses Continued Frustration with Contract Guard Program AFGE Local 918-FPS President David Wright testifies before House Homeland Security Committee |
(WASHINGTON) In response to recent Government Accountability Office reports that Federal Protective Service contract guards are not performing well, AFGE FPS
Local 918 President David Wright said those reports are in line with what AFGE has been saying for years -- that FPS needs to be a fully-federalized agency.
Testifying on April 14, 2010, before House Committee on Homeland Security, Wright explained that while Federal Protective Service law enforcement officers are
charged with the monitoring and oversight of Contract Guards, the ratio of CGs to FPS officers has steadily increased from 6.3 percent in 2001 to 18.3 percent in 2010.
"There are approximately 750 street level law enforcement officers responsible for all CG training, monitoring and oversight, law enforcement patrol, response to law
enforcement/security calls for service and physical security administration duties," Wright said. "A schedule has been released to mandate regular inspections of CG's
different security level facilities. These efforts are ineffective in that the schedule pertains to the facility guard post and is based only on the security level not the
number of individual CG or even the number of posts at a certain facility. Thus some posts and guards will be inspected every week, while others may only be
inspected two or three times a year. It is also conceivable that some CGs can evade inspection for years.
"Furthermore, the GAO's documentation of the lack of effective oversight of security contracts speaks to the 'jack of all trades' mentality of FPS management in
decreasing manpower and combining distinct job duties into the Inspector position," Wright continued. "This is all a direct result of the fee funding scheme mandated for
FPS. Efforts to increase security fees in order to increase revenue are an exercise in futility.
"It is evident that the federal government can no longer rely on private companies to provide security guards -- whose training and authority is determined by individual
states and municipalities -- to continue to protect high profile, high security federal properties. The massive effort needed to modify private security contracts for each
new training requirement is not feasible and costs the taxpayer money they can ill afford."
AFGE Local 918 recommends that the FPS use the model developed by the U.S. Capitol Police and the U.S. Secret Service Uniformed Division. The officers that
provide security at the Capitol and Congressional office buildings are federal employees. They are trained at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center and
possess the authority of arrest on federal property.
"I have seen this agency go from a proud, committed, mission-focused agency to one that seems more focused on saving money than protecting the employees and
citizens who work in federal buildings," Wright said. "While federalization of FPS security guards will cost more at the outset, we believe that the time, effort and money
saved in the oversight process will increase security at federal properties. AFGE Local 918 would like to thank Chairman Thompson for holding these very necessary
hearing, and urges Congress to take advantage of the current momentum and begin the federalization process of FPS security guards."
Local 918 President David Wright said those reports are in line with what AFGE has been saying for years -- that FPS needs to be a fully-federalized agency.
Testifying on April 14, 2010, before House Committee on Homeland Security, Wright explained that while Federal Protective Service law enforcement officers are
charged with the monitoring and oversight of Contract Guards, the ratio of CGs to FPS officers has steadily increased from 6.3 percent in 2001 to 18.3 percent in 2010.
"There are approximately 750 street level law enforcement officers responsible for all CG training, monitoring and oversight, law enforcement patrol, response to law
enforcement/security calls for service and physical security administration duties," Wright said. "A schedule has been released to mandate regular inspections of CG's
different security level facilities. These efforts are ineffective in that the schedule pertains to the facility guard post and is based only on the security level not the
number of individual CG or even the number of posts at a certain facility. Thus some posts and guards will be inspected every week, while others may only be
inspected two or three times a year. It is also conceivable that some CGs can evade inspection for years.
"Furthermore, the GAO's documentation of the lack of effective oversight of security contracts speaks to the 'jack of all trades' mentality of FPS management in
decreasing manpower and combining distinct job duties into the Inspector position," Wright continued. "This is all a direct result of the fee funding scheme mandated for
FPS. Efforts to increase security fees in order to increase revenue are an exercise in futility.
"It is evident that the federal government can no longer rely on private companies to provide security guards -- whose training and authority is determined by individual
states and municipalities -- to continue to protect high profile, high security federal properties. The massive effort needed to modify private security contracts for each
new training requirement is not feasible and costs the taxpayer money they can ill afford."
AFGE Local 918 recommends that the FPS use the model developed by the U.S. Capitol Police and the U.S. Secret Service Uniformed Division. The officers that
provide security at the Capitol and Congressional office buildings are federal employees. They are trained at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center and
possess the authority of arrest on federal property.
"I have seen this agency go from a proud, committed, mission-focused agency to one that seems more focused on saving money than protecting the employees and
citizens who work in federal buildings," Wright said. "While federalization of FPS security guards will cost more at the outset, we believe that the time, effort and money
saved in the oversight process will increase security at federal properties. AFGE Local 918 would like to thank Chairman Thompson for holding these very necessary
hearing, and urges Congress to take advantage of the current momentum and begin the federalization process of FPS security guards."
April 15, 2010
| AFGE Thanks Rep. Thompson for Hearing on Contract Guards at FPS |
(WASHINGTON)—In response to an April 14 House Homeland Security Committee hearing on the Federal Protective Service, American Federation of Government
Employees National President John Gage today issued the following statement:
“On behalf of the AFGE, I just want to express our thanks to House Committee on Homeland Security Chairman Bennie Thompson for his commitment to protecting the
safety of our nation's lawmakers and federal employees who work in some 9,000 government owned or leased buildings across the U.S.
The hearing yesterday shined a bright light on a grim situation at the Federal Protective Service. This is an agency in crisis; an agency that will require significant
change before it can credibly perform its critical homeland security mission. The Chairman’s hearing, focusing on the need to overhaul the private contractor guard
system, is an essential step in the process of reforming this beleaguered agency.
We look forward to working with Chairman Thompson and his staff on legislation to implement the changes discussed at the hearing.”
Employees National President John Gage today issued the following statement:
“On behalf of the AFGE, I just want to express our thanks to House Committee on Homeland Security Chairman Bennie Thompson for his commitment to protecting the
safety of our nation's lawmakers and federal employees who work in some 9,000 government owned or leased buildings across the U.S.
The hearing yesterday shined a bright light on a grim situation at the Federal Protective Service. This is an agency in crisis; an agency that will require significant
change before it can credibly perform its critical homeland security mission. The Chairman’s hearing, focusing on the need to overhaul the private contractor guard
system, is an essential step in the process of reforming this beleaguered agency.
We look forward to working with Chairman Thompson and his staff on legislation to implement the changes discussed at the hearing.”
April 15, 2010
| FPS Reform and Enhancement Act Introduced in House Congressman Dent introduces H.R. 5053 to enhance the ability of FPS to provide security, prevent terrorist attacks at federal facilities nationwide |
Congressman Charlie Dent (R-PA) introduced H.R. 5053, the "Federal Protective Service Reform and Enhancement Act of 2010" today. The bill would amend the
Homeland Security Act of 2002 to enhance the Federal Protective Service's ability to provide adequate security for the prevention of terrorist activities and for the
promotion of homeland security, and for other purposes. It is anticipated that a similar bill will also be introduced in the Senate. AFGE Local 918-FPS is working closely
with Congress to ensure that FPS has the tools and resources it needs to accomplish the mission. We continue to pursue enhanced law enforcement retirement
benefits for our uniformed law enforcement members.
Homeland Security Act of 2002 to enhance the Federal Protective Service's ability to provide adequate security for the prevention of terrorist activities and for the
promotion of homeland security, and for other purposes. It is anticipated that a similar bill will also be introduced in the Senate. AFGE Local 918-FPS is working closely
with Congress to ensure that FPS has the tools and resources it needs to accomplish the mission. We continue to pursue enhanced law enforcement retirement
benefits for our uniformed law enforcement members.
April 19, 2010
| OKLAHOMA CITY BOMBING ANNIVERSARY REMINDER OF NEED FOR FEDERAL PROTECTIVE SERVICE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS |
(WASHINGTON)--On the 15th anniversary of the devastating bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, we are reminded that that federal
buildings and federal employees are potential targets of terrorism and crime, and that the Federal Protective Service must be a fully-funded and fully-federalized
agency, American Federation of Government Employees Local 918 President David Wright said today.
“It is a travesty that the main federal agency, whose mission it is to protect those very facilities and people, is unable to accomplish its mission, due in part to a largely
contract guard workforce,” Wright said.
The Federal Protective Service has been cited in at least six GAO reports over the past two years as an agency in disarray. Its contract guards lack Federal authority as
they are commissioned by local and state authorities. In addition, the private contract guards are underpaid, undertrained and under-monitored, said AFGE
“FPS manpower has been reduced to levels so low that there were more law enforcement personnel before the Oklahoma City bombing,” Wright said. “It further suffered
from a policy of benign neglect by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement—the agency until recently charged with overseeing FPS operations.
“FPS treatment by ICE forced the first internal reorganization since DHS was stood up. The transfer of FPS in October 2009 to the National Protection and Programs
Directorate was critically important,” Wright added. “This is one measure of how far this agency needs to go before it can fully perform its mission.”
Both the House and Senate Homeland Security Committees, the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, and the House Committee on Government Reform
have held numerous hearings on the failings of FPS to perform its mission. Work is underway on both sides of Congress to introduce FPS reform legislation this year.
“There is a real urgency to congressional action on this issue. Recent attacks on federal employees and serious threats to Members of Congress should be as much a
reminder of the need to reform FPS as is this, the 15th anniversary of the attack in Oklahoma City,” Wright said.
AFGE Local 918 represents FPS officers and personnel nationwide.
buildings and federal employees are potential targets of terrorism and crime, and that the Federal Protective Service must be a fully-funded and fully-federalized
agency, American Federation of Government Employees Local 918 President David Wright said today.
“It is a travesty that the main federal agency, whose mission it is to protect those very facilities and people, is unable to accomplish its mission, due in part to a largely
contract guard workforce,” Wright said.
The Federal Protective Service has been cited in at least six GAO reports over the past two years as an agency in disarray. Its contract guards lack Federal authority as
they are commissioned by local and state authorities. In addition, the private contract guards are underpaid, undertrained and under-monitored, said AFGE
“FPS manpower has been reduced to levels so low that there were more law enforcement personnel before the Oklahoma City bombing,” Wright said. “It further suffered
from a policy of benign neglect by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement—the agency until recently charged with overseeing FPS operations.
“FPS treatment by ICE forced the first internal reorganization since DHS was stood up. The transfer of FPS in October 2009 to the National Protection and Programs
Directorate was critically important,” Wright added. “This is one measure of how far this agency needs to go before it can fully perform its mission.”
Both the House and Senate Homeland Security Committees, the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, and the House Committee on Government Reform
have held numerous hearings on the failings of FPS to perform its mission. Work is underway on both sides of Congress to introduce FPS reform legislation this year.
“There is a real urgency to congressional action on this issue. Recent attacks on federal employees and serious threats to Members of Congress should be as much a
reminder of the need to reform FPS as is this, the 15th anniversary of the attack in Oklahoma City,” Wright said.
AFGE Local 918 represents FPS officers and personnel nationwide.
April 27, 2010
| Attention FPS Inspectors: Report RAMP Issues to AFGE Local 918-FPS |
AFGE Local 918-FPS is requesting FPS Inspectors report issues and concerns they personally experience with the new Risk Assessment and Management
Program (RAMP) to the ICE Help Desk and to AFGE Local 918-FPS. Local 918 is deeply concerned that FPS HQ is not actively and properly engaging and listening to
Inspectors, the primary users of RAMP, about the many issues and problems that Inspectors are encountering with the software program. Further, Local 918 believes
that senior FPS personnel have overstated the current operational status and functionality of RAMP in certain venues and that these actions have falsely represented
that RAMP is having a positive impact on the mission. Local 918 would like to hear from FPS Inspectors and other users of RAMP about issues and concerns they have
about the program. Send your concerns to RAMP_issues@afgelocal918.org. If you wish your comments to remain confidential, do not send them using your DHS
e-mail address. Local 918 will maintain the confidentiality of all comments submitted to the extent possible by law. Local 918 will compile all comments received to
determine an accurate assessment of RAMP's operational status and its impact upon the mission of the Federal Protective Service.
Program (RAMP) to the ICE Help Desk and to AFGE Local 918-FPS. Local 918 is deeply concerned that FPS HQ is not actively and properly engaging and listening to
Inspectors, the primary users of RAMP, about the many issues and problems that Inspectors are encountering with the software program. Further, Local 918 believes
that senior FPS personnel have overstated the current operational status and functionality of RAMP in certain venues and that these actions have falsely represented
that RAMP is having a positive impact on the mission. Local 918 would like to hear from FPS Inspectors and other users of RAMP about issues and concerns they have
about the program. Send your concerns to RAMP_issues@afgelocal918.org. If you wish your comments to remain confidential, do not send them using your DHS
e-mail address. Local 918 will maintain the confidentiality of all comments submitted to the extent possible by law. Local 918 will compile all comments received to
determine an accurate assessment of RAMP's operational status and its impact upon the mission of the Federal Protective Service.
May 3, 2010
| FPS Releases RAMP 1.1.1, Forgets About Most Important 1 Another "fix" for the problem plagued FPS risk assessment software program is released |
This weekend, May 1-3, 2010, the Federal Protective Service released yet another "fix" to its Risk Assessment and Management Program (RAMP). FPS released
RAMP version 1.1.1 but still fails to consider the most important 1 – the FPS Inspector –the Inspector who is expected to use RAMP daily yet is continually frustrated by
poor functionality and connectivity issues with the software program, inadequate training and guidance and unrealistic expectations from FPS managers. RAMP users
continue to see problems ranging from the basic opening of the program, accessing modules within the program and entering data and saving work within the program.
The lack of any field-testing and insufficient training and guidance continue to plague RAMP and any positive impact it was expected to have on the FPS mission. In
fact, the only success RAMP has seen is in its ability to pull Inspectors from conducting law enforcement patrol and field work to spending more hours behind a desk
trying to figure out and work with this ineffective risk management program. What was supposed to help FPS accomplish its mission and make federal facilities safer
and more secure is in fact having the opposite effect. RAMP needs to be taken off line, its problems fixed and the program tested before being fully re-introduced for
use in the field and acceptance as an effective tool and an asset towards the FPS mission of making federal facilities safer and more secure. FPS needs to start
soliciting and accepting feedback from its Inspectors, the primary users of RAMP, and implementing their ideas and suggestions. The time to for action is now. The
Band-Aid fixes are not the answer and urgent action is essential to any possible future success of RAMP.
RAMP version 1.1.1 but still fails to consider the most important 1 – the FPS Inspector –the Inspector who is expected to use RAMP daily yet is continually frustrated by
poor functionality and connectivity issues with the software program, inadequate training and guidance and unrealistic expectations from FPS managers. RAMP users
continue to see problems ranging from the basic opening of the program, accessing modules within the program and entering data and saving work within the program.
The lack of any field-testing and insufficient training and guidance continue to plague RAMP and any positive impact it was expected to have on the FPS mission. In
fact, the only success RAMP has seen is in its ability to pull Inspectors from conducting law enforcement patrol and field work to spending more hours behind a desk
trying to figure out and work with this ineffective risk management program. What was supposed to help FPS accomplish its mission and make federal facilities safer
and more secure is in fact having the opposite effect. RAMP needs to be taken off line, its problems fixed and the program tested before being fully re-introduced for
use in the field and acceptance as an effective tool and an asset towards the FPS mission of making federal facilities safer and more secure. FPS needs to start
soliciting and accepting feedback from its Inspectors, the primary users of RAMP, and implementing their ideas and suggestions. The time to for action is now. The
Band-Aid fixes are not the answer and urgent action is essential to any possible future success of RAMP.
May 3, 2010
| AFGE Calls for Federalization, Full Funding for FPS |
On the 15th anniversary of the devastating bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City in April, AFGE is calling for federalization and full funding
for the agency tasked with protecting federal employees and facilities, the Federal Protective Service (FPS). FPS has about 15,000 contract guards and about 800
federal law enforcement officers. The agency has been a subject of scrutiny by the Government Accountability Office, which this month issued yet another report on how
FPS inspectors managed to sneak in guns, knives, and bombs two-thirds of the time into federal buildings protected by contract security guards. These contract guards
are underpaid, undertrained and under-monitored.
"Federal buildings and federal employees are potential targets of terrorism and crime. It is a travesty that the main federal agency whose mission it is to protect those
very facilities and people is unable to accomplish its mission, due in part to a largely contract guard workforce," said David Wright, president of AFGE Local 918
representing FPS employees nationwide. Wright, who recently testified before Congress on this exact issue, said FPS manpower has been reduced to levels so low that
there were more law enforcement personnel before the Oklahoma City bombing.
AFGE has been shining a spotlight on staffing and funding issues at FPS for years. The union last year successfully convinced Congress to hire more federal law
enforcement officers and move FPS out of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement to be under the National Protection and Programs Directorate so that it receives
the attention it deserves. It's a step in the right direction but more needs to be done. AFGE supports efforts by Congress to introduce FPS reform legislation later this
year.
for the agency tasked with protecting federal employees and facilities, the Federal Protective Service (FPS). FPS has about 15,000 contract guards and about 800
federal law enforcement officers. The agency has been a subject of scrutiny by the Government Accountability Office, which this month issued yet another report on how
FPS inspectors managed to sneak in guns, knives, and bombs two-thirds of the time into federal buildings protected by contract security guards. These contract guards
are underpaid, undertrained and under-monitored.
"Federal buildings and federal employees are potential targets of terrorism and crime. It is a travesty that the main federal agency whose mission it is to protect those
very facilities and people is unable to accomplish its mission, due in part to a largely contract guard workforce," said David Wright, president of AFGE Local 918
representing FPS employees nationwide. Wright, who recently testified before Congress on this exact issue, said FPS manpower has been reduced to levels so low that
there were more law enforcement personnel before the Oklahoma City bombing.
AFGE has been shining a spotlight on staffing and funding issues at FPS for years. The union last year successfully convinced Congress to hire more federal law
enforcement officers and move FPS out of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement to be under the National Protection and Programs Directorate so that it receives
the attention it deserves. It's a step in the right direction but more needs to be done. AFGE supports efforts by Congress to introduce FPS reform legislation later this
year.
May 25, 2010
| Federal Protective Service Director Announces Departure Director Schenkel to assume new position in DHS Office of State & Local Law Enforcement |
FPS Director Gary Schenkel announced his departure from the Federal Protective Service today and his new position in the Department of Homeland Security's Office
of State and Local Law Enforcement. In a statement released to FPS employees this afternoon, Director Schenkel stated "for the past three plus years I have been
privileged and honored to lead this outstanding organization through many challenges and triumphs."
of State and Local Law Enforcement. In a statement released to FPS employees this afternoon, Director Schenkel stated "for the past three plus years I have been
privileged and honored to lead this outstanding organization through many challenges and triumphs."
May 25, 2010
| FPS Union Looks Forward to New Chapter for FPS AFGE Local 918 Acknowledges Transition of FPS Director |
his new position with the DHS Office of State and Law Enforcement.
FPS has faced many challenges over the last few years. Local 918 looks forward to beginning a new chapter for FPS and we urge Under Secretary Rand Beers to
make the appointment of a new Director a top priority. We recommend that Under Secretary Beers select a well-qualified law enforcement professional who can balance
the equally important law enforcement and protection missions of FPS. There is much work that lies ahead and strong, positive and effective leadership is essential at
this critical time for FPS. Local 918 is optimistic for the future of the Federal Protective Service and the federal law enforcement officers and support personnel of FPS
who serve everyday to ensure Secure Facilities, Safe Occupants.
FPS has faced many challenges over the last few years. Local 918 looks forward to beginning a new chapter for FPS and we urge Under Secretary Rand Beers to
make the appointment of a new Director a top priority. We recommend that Under Secretary Beers select a well-qualified law enforcement professional who can balance
the equally important law enforcement and protection missions of FPS. There is much work that lies ahead and strong, positive and effective leadership is essential at
this critical time for FPS. Local 918 is optimistic for the future of the Federal Protective Service and the federal law enforcement officers and support personnel of FPS
who serve everyday to ensure Secure Facilities, Safe Occupants.
Washington, D.C. (Monday, June 28, 2010) -- Today, U.S. Rep. Peter T. King (R-NY), Ranking Member of the Committee on Homeland Security, along with Republican
(H.R. 5590), legislation that will provide DHS with necessary guidance, tools, and resources to help protect our homeland from terrorist attack.
King said: “Congress has not produced a comprehensive authorization of the Department of Homeland Security since its establishment. That has to change. Just as
other Congressional committees regularly authorize the federal departments over which they have responsibility, we believe that it is important that the Committee on
Homeland Security do the same.”
“Following the Committee on Homeland Security’s permanent establishment in 2005, Republican leadership ensured that the Committee passed a DHS authorization bill
each year during the Republican majority. But unfortunately, the Committee has failed to consider a comprehensive authorization bill for the past three years. We have
waited long enough.”
“The Committee has previously heard extensive testimony on the pressing need for an authorization that will guide the Department in its critical mission of protecting our
homeland from terrorist attack. I urge Congress to promptly move this legislation.”
In the bill they introduced, Republicans have included numerous provisions proposed by both Democrats and Republicans, many of which have garnered bipartisan
support in the Committee and on the House floor.
Joining King in co-sponsoring the legislation are Rep. Dan Lungren (R-CA), Rep. Mike Rogers (R-AL), Rep. Michael McCaul (R-TX), Rep. Charlie Dent (R-PA), Rep.
Gus Bilirakis (R-FL), Rep. Paul Broun (R-GA), Rep. Candice Miller (R-MI), Rep. Pete Olson (R-TX), Rep. Anh “Joseph” Cao (R-LA), and Rep. Steve Austria (R-OH).
(H.R. 5590), legislation that will provide DHS with necessary guidance, tools, and resources to help protect our homeland from terrorist attack.
King said: “Congress has not produced a comprehensive authorization of the Department of Homeland Security since its establishment. That has to change. Just as
other Congressional committees regularly authorize the federal departments over which they have responsibility, we believe that it is important that the Committee on
Homeland Security do the same.”
“Following the Committee on Homeland Security’s permanent establishment in 2005, Republican leadership ensured that the Committee passed a DHS authorization bill
each year during the Republican majority. But unfortunately, the Committee has failed to consider a comprehensive authorization bill for the past three years. We have
waited long enough.”
“The Committee has previously heard extensive testimony on the pressing need for an authorization that will guide the Department in its critical mission of protecting our
homeland from terrorist attack. I urge Congress to promptly move this legislation.”
In the bill they introduced, Republicans have included numerous provisions proposed by both Democrats and Republicans, many of which have garnered bipartisan
support in the Committee and on the House floor.
- The “Counterterrorism Enhancement and Department of Homeland Security Authorization Act of 2010” will:
- Authorize the Securing the Cities program, which helps prevent a nuclear or radiological attack in New York City, and expands the program to other high risk
metropolitan areas; - Prohibit the use of Department of Justice funds to prosecute Guantanamo detainees in the United States, and prevent the transfer or release of detainees in the
U.S. without a state’s consent and certification by the President that a transfer poses no security risk; - Enhance counterterrorism efforts, including initiatives to prevent violent radicalization and homegrown terrorism;
- Reduce the number of committees to which homeland security matters are referred (during the 110th Congress, 108 Congressional committees and
subcommittees exercised jurisdiction over the Department of Homeland Security); - Bolster border security and immigration enforcement efforts, in part by requiring a strategy to achieve full control of the border by 2016;
- Secure aviation, rail, and other surface transportation systems;
- Increase maritime security, in part by expanding the Container Security Initiative;
- Strengthen critical infrastructure and cyber security;
- Enhance counterterrorism functions of the Federal Protective Service;
- Improve preparedness and response to terrorism and other emergencies;
- Provide for more efficient and effective management of the Department.
Joining King in co-sponsoring the legislation are Rep. Dan Lungren (R-CA), Rep. Mike Rogers (R-AL), Rep. Michael McCaul (R-TX), Rep. Charlie Dent (R-PA), Rep.
Gus Bilirakis (R-FL), Rep. Paul Broun (R-GA), Rep. Candice Miller (R-MI), Rep. Pete Olson (R-TX), Rep. Anh “Joseph” Cao (R-LA), and Rep. Steve Austria (R-OH).
| Rep. King, Homeland Security Republicans Introduce Counterterrorism and DHS Authorization Bill Bill Enhances counterterrorism functions of the Federal Protective Service |
June 28, 2010
AFGE Local 918 has learned that on July 30, 2010, FPS Inspector Stephen House was found guilty of eight Federal misdemeanor charges of “deprivation of civil rights
under color of law” and four felony counts of falsifying official government reports regarding off property/off duty traffic stops.
Also on July 30, 2010, a case of an off duty action in the case of a suspected DUI resulted in the resignation of a 7-year FPS veteran Police Officer/Inspector.
Based on our knowledge of these cases, Local 918 urges every FPS law enforcement officer to become familiar with and absolutely adhere to all pertinent FPS, ICE,
NPPD and DHS policies concerning government vehicles, home-to-work vehicle usage, field interviews, weapons, uniforms, badge/credentials and report writing.
Ability to clearly articulate facts and logical reasoning is imperative in your official reports for any vehicle stop or field interview – on or off duty – on or off GSA property
– or in any citizen‘s arrest case that an FPS LE Officer would find necessary to engage or participate in.
Any questions for clarification of policy or procedure should be addressed to the employee's chain of command in writing. Written answers to your concerns from your
chain of command should be the rule of the day. Be especially wary of any claims that you can use your citizen’s arrest rights in performance of your official duties or
that you can use Agency identification/equipment in connection with off property or off duty incidents. Copy AFGE Local 918 President David L. Wright (david.
wright@afgelocal918.org) on any such inquiry for clarification. In the event that you do not receive answers in a timely manner, AFGE Local 918 President Wright will
make the appropriate contacts at FPS HQ and above.
In the aftermath of unusual circumstances of any arrest, vehicle stop or field interview, contact your first line supervisor and request the ”.wav files” (recordings) from
the appropriate FPS Megacenter.
In the interim, AFGE Local 918 will be pressing for an overall clarification of FPS policy by the Agency on all such matters. At this point, FPS LE Officers should not rely
on State peace officer status or any citizen arrest rights as a defense against potential alleged violations of Agency policy or Federal law.
AFGE Local 918 also needs to immediately know of any state laws or case law that would require Federal law enforcement officers to intervene in non-federal situations
in any particular state.
AFGE Local 918 also encourages any and all Federal employees – particularly law enforcement officers – to obtain Professional Liability Insurance available from
several law firms across the country. Important considerations of any PLI policy would be the provision of defense in administrative investigations, civil lawsuits and
criminal matters in the course of employment..
under color of law” and four felony counts of falsifying official government reports regarding off property/off duty traffic stops.
Also on July 30, 2010, a case of an off duty action in the case of a suspected DUI resulted in the resignation of a 7-year FPS veteran Police Officer/Inspector.
Based on our knowledge of these cases, Local 918 urges every FPS law enforcement officer to become familiar with and absolutely adhere to all pertinent FPS, ICE,
NPPD and DHS policies concerning government vehicles, home-to-work vehicle usage, field interviews, weapons, uniforms, badge/credentials and report writing.
Ability to clearly articulate facts and logical reasoning is imperative in your official reports for any vehicle stop or field interview – on or off duty – on or off GSA property
– or in any citizen‘s arrest case that an FPS LE Officer would find necessary to engage or participate in.
Any questions for clarification of policy or procedure should be addressed to the employee's chain of command in writing. Written answers to your concerns from your
chain of command should be the rule of the day. Be especially wary of any claims that you can use your citizen’s arrest rights in performance of your official duties or
that you can use Agency identification/equipment in connection with off property or off duty incidents. Copy AFGE Local 918 President David L. Wright (david.
wright@afgelocal918.org) on any such inquiry for clarification. In the event that you do not receive answers in a timely manner, AFGE Local 918 President Wright will
make the appropriate contacts at FPS HQ and above.
In the aftermath of unusual circumstances of any arrest, vehicle stop or field interview, contact your first line supervisor and request the ”.wav files” (recordings) from
the appropriate FPS Megacenter.
In the interim, AFGE Local 918 will be pressing for an overall clarification of FPS policy by the Agency on all such matters. At this point, FPS LE Officers should not rely
on State peace officer status or any citizen arrest rights as a defense against potential alleged violations of Agency policy or Federal law.
AFGE Local 918 also needs to immediately know of any state laws or case law that would require Federal law enforcement officers to intervene in non-federal situations
in any particular state.
AFGE Local 918 also encourages any and all Federal employees – particularly law enforcement officers – to obtain Professional Liability Insurance available from
several law firms across the country. Important considerations of any PLI policy would be the provision of defense in administrative investigations, civil lawsuits and
criminal matters in the course of employment..
| Local 918 President Urges Member Familiarity with Agency Policies |
July 31, 2010
WASHINGTON— Democratic and Republican leaders of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee introduced bipartisan legislation Monday to reform
and modernize the Federal Protective Service (FPS), which is responsible for providing security at 9,000 federal buildings with 1,200 fulltime employees and 15,000
contract guards.
The Supporting Employee Competency and Updating Readiness Enhancements for Facilities Act of 2010 (SECURE Facilities Act) was introduced by Committee
Chairman Joe Lieberman, ID-Conn., Ranking Member Susan Collins, R-Me., Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management, the Federal Workforce, and the
District of Columbia Chairman Daniel Akaka, D-Hawaii, and Subcommittee Ranking Member George Voinovich, R-Ohio.
“FPS is essentially a dysfunctional agency whose mission is in grave peril,” Lieberman said. “Budget shortfalls, mismanagement and multiple operational challenges
have taken their toll on the agency, making it a prime candidate for reform. We aim to provide FPS with adequate resources, strengthen its management capabilities,
and help it function at a higher level so it can more effectively protect visitors and employees at federal buildings across this country.”
Collins said: “The FPS is charged with securing nearly 9,000 federal facilities and protecting the government employees who work in them, and the Americans who use
them to access vital services. But, independent investigations by the Government Accountability Office and the Department of Homeland Security Inspector General
have documented serious and systemic security flaws within the operations of the FPS. These lapses place federal employees and private citizens at risk.
“While shining a light on these failings in multiple hearings, our Committee pressed the FPS to take action to close these security gaps. Although some tentative steps
have been taken by FPS, we can no longer wait for the Office of Management and Budget and the Department of Homeland Security to implement the absolutely critical
security measures necessary to help protect our federal buildings, our federal employees, and the American public. The SECURE Facilities Act would help close these
security gaps at our federal buildings. The American public that relies on these facilities and the federal employees who work in them deserve better and more reliable
protection.”
Akaka said: “I am pleased to join this bipartisan effort to address training and operational challenges within the Federal Protective Service. “This legislation ensures
FPS has the full time staff it needs to carry out its mission, and increases oversight of contract guards. FPS must have the tools it needs to keep over 9,000 federal
facilities safe.”
Voinovich said: “We must do all we can to ensure that our federal buildings are safe for employees and visitors alike. This much-needed bill will bring FPS up to the
staffing and security levels needed to protect these individuals and property. I urge my colleagues to support this bill.”
The senators asked the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to undertake a comprehensive review of the FPS, leading to eight reports to Congress between 2004
and 2010. GAO concluded that contract guards lacked adequate training, FPS oversight of the guards was poor, and many of the standards and manuals guiding
guard behavior were outdated. GAO investigators were able to slip bomb-making materials through security at several high security buildings, assemble a bomb in a
public restroom, and wander the halls at will. Elsewhere a contract guard was found to be asleep at his station, while another allowed an infant in a carrier to go through
an x-ray machine.
The SECURE Facilities Act of 2010 addresses shortcomings reported by the GAO and congressional oversight and incorporates many of GAO’s recommendations.
Under the SECURE Facilities Act, FPS would be formally authorized for the first time, as would the interagency body responsible for establishing security standards for
all federal facilities.
The bill addresses four major challenges:
• Ensure that FPS has sufficient personnel to carry out its mission. This legislation provides adequate resources for FPS to hire 500 additional full time employees
over the next four years. It also ensures that FPS never employs fewer than 1,200 full time employees at any point.
• Tackle deficiencies within the contract guard program. The bill requires FPS to maintain testing programs to assess the training of guards, security of federal
facilities, and to establish procedures for retraining or terminating ineffective guards.
• Ensure FPS is focused and prepared to address the threat of explosives. The SECURE Facilities Act requires DHS to establish performance-based standards for
checkpoint detection technologies for explosives and other threats at federal facilities. It would allow FPS officers to carry firearms off duty, just as most other federal law
enforcement officers can, enabling them to respond to incidents more quickly.
• Pay attention to the delicate balance between public access and security. Though the emphasis remains on security, the bill also supports avenues of appeal if a
building tenant believes security measures unduly hinder public access.
and modernize the Federal Protective Service (FPS), which is responsible for providing security at 9,000 federal buildings with 1,200 fulltime employees and 15,000
contract guards.
The Supporting Employee Competency and Updating Readiness Enhancements for Facilities Act of 2010 (SECURE Facilities Act) was introduced by Committee
Chairman Joe Lieberman, ID-Conn., Ranking Member Susan Collins, R-Me., Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management, the Federal Workforce, and the
District of Columbia Chairman Daniel Akaka, D-Hawaii, and Subcommittee Ranking Member George Voinovich, R-Ohio.
“FPS is essentially a dysfunctional agency whose mission is in grave peril,” Lieberman said. “Budget shortfalls, mismanagement and multiple operational challenges
have taken their toll on the agency, making it a prime candidate for reform. We aim to provide FPS with adequate resources, strengthen its management capabilities,
and help it function at a higher level so it can more effectively protect visitors and employees at federal buildings across this country.”
Collins said: “The FPS is charged with securing nearly 9,000 federal facilities and protecting the government employees who work in them, and the Americans who use
them to access vital services. But, independent investigations by the Government Accountability Office and the Department of Homeland Security Inspector General
have documented serious and systemic security flaws within the operations of the FPS. These lapses place federal employees and private citizens at risk.
“While shining a light on these failings in multiple hearings, our Committee pressed the FPS to take action to close these security gaps. Although some tentative steps
have been taken by FPS, we can no longer wait for the Office of Management and Budget and the Department of Homeland Security to implement the absolutely critical
security measures necessary to help protect our federal buildings, our federal employees, and the American public. The SECURE Facilities Act would help close these
security gaps at our federal buildings. The American public that relies on these facilities and the federal employees who work in them deserve better and more reliable
protection.”
Akaka said: “I am pleased to join this bipartisan effort to address training and operational challenges within the Federal Protective Service. “This legislation ensures
FPS has the full time staff it needs to carry out its mission, and increases oversight of contract guards. FPS must have the tools it needs to keep over 9,000 federal
facilities safe.”
Voinovich said: “We must do all we can to ensure that our federal buildings are safe for employees and visitors alike. This much-needed bill will bring FPS up to the
staffing and security levels needed to protect these individuals and property. I urge my colleagues to support this bill.”
The senators asked the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to undertake a comprehensive review of the FPS, leading to eight reports to Congress between 2004
and 2010. GAO concluded that contract guards lacked adequate training, FPS oversight of the guards was poor, and many of the standards and manuals guiding
guard behavior were outdated. GAO investigators were able to slip bomb-making materials through security at several high security buildings, assemble a bomb in a
public restroom, and wander the halls at will. Elsewhere a contract guard was found to be asleep at his station, while another allowed an infant in a carrier to go through
an x-ray machine.
The SECURE Facilities Act of 2010 addresses shortcomings reported by the GAO and congressional oversight and incorporates many of GAO’s recommendations.
Under the SECURE Facilities Act, FPS would be formally authorized for the first time, as would the interagency body responsible for establishing security standards for
all federal facilities.
The bill addresses four major challenges:
• Ensure that FPS has sufficient personnel to carry out its mission. This legislation provides adequate resources for FPS to hire 500 additional full time employees
over the next four years. It also ensures that FPS never employs fewer than 1,200 full time employees at any point.
• Tackle deficiencies within the contract guard program. The bill requires FPS to maintain testing programs to assess the training of guards, security of federal
facilities, and to establish procedures for retraining or terminating ineffective guards.
• Ensure FPS is focused and prepared to address the threat of explosives. The SECURE Facilities Act requires DHS to establish performance-based standards for
checkpoint detection technologies for explosives and other threats at federal facilities. It would allow FPS officers to carry firearms off duty, just as most other federal law
enforcement officers can, enabling them to respond to incidents more quickly.
• Pay attention to the delicate balance between public access and security. Though the emphasis remains on security, the bill also supports avenues of appeal if a
building tenant believes security measures unduly hinder public access.
| SENATORS INTRODUCE BILL TO MODERNIZE, REFORM FEDERAL PROTECTIVE SERVICE Bipartisan SECURE Facilities Act Would Transform Agency in Peril |
September 20, 2010
WASHINGTON— The Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Wednesday agreed by unanimous voice vote to report out legislation to strengthen the
security of visitors and employees at 9,000 federal buildings across the United States.
“Our bipartisan bill will modernize and reform an important, but often overlooked agency at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the Federal Protective Service
(FPS),” Chairman Joe Lieberman, ID-Conn., said. “The FPS is responsible for the security of employees and visitors at 9,000 federal buildings across the country. But
its mission is in peril due to budget shortfalls, mismanagement of the agency and its contract guard workforce, and multiple operational challenges. A series of reports
from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) and the DHS Inspector General have found FPS to be a seriously dysfunctional agency that lacks focus or a strategy
for accomplishing its mission.
“The people—not just employees, but millions of visitors—who enter federal buildings each year deserve better protection. Our bill provides that by ensuring that FPS
has sufficient staff to carry out its mission, by tackling deficiencies within the contract guard program, by ensuring FPS is ready to take on the threat of explosives, and
by striking a good balance between both public access and security.”
Collins said: “The current situation at FPS is a disaster waiting to happen. Independent investigations of FPS by the Government Accountability Office and Department
of Homeland Security Inspector General have discovered pervasive security gaps, lax oversight, inadequate training, and systemic operational flaws. The findings were
so alarming that the Chairman and I labeled the agency’s overall work a ‘security crisis.’” In one case, Collins said, GAO investigators were able to smuggle simulated
bombs into 10 high-risk federal buildings, penetrating the security systems of all 10 buildings selected.
“The bipartisan legislation before us today is the solution to this security crisis,” she said.
The Supporting Employee Competency and Updating Readiness Enhancements for (SECURE) Facilities Act of 2010, S. 3806, was approved unanimously by voice vote
as amended by a substitute amendment from Lieberman, Collins, Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management, the Federal Workforce, and the District of
Columbia Chairman Daniel Akaka, D-Hawaii, and Ranking Member George Voinovich, R-Ohio.
security of visitors and employees at 9,000 federal buildings across the United States.
“Our bipartisan bill will modernize and reform an important, but often overlooked agency at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the Federal Protective Service
(FPS),” Chairman Joe Lieberman, ID-Conn., said. “The FPS is responsible for the security of employees and visitors at 9,000 federal buildings across the country. But
its mission is in peril due to budget shortfalls, mismanagement of the agency and its contract guard workforce, and multiple operational challenges. A series of reports
from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) and the DHS Inspector General have found FPS to be a seriously dysfunctional agency that lacks focus or a strategy
for accomplishing its mission.
“The people—not just employees, but millions of visitors—who enter federal buildings each year deserve better protection. Our bill provides that by ensuring that FPS
has sufficient staff to carry out its mission, by tackling deficiencies within the contract guard program, by ensuring FPS is ready to take on the threat of explosives, and
by striking a good balance between both public access and security.”
Collins said: “The current situation at FPS is a disaster waiting to happen. Independent investigations of FPS by the Government Accountability Office and Department
of Homeland Security Inspector General have discovered pervasive security gaps, lax oversight, inadequate training, and systemic operational flaws. The findings were
so alarming that the Chairman and I labeled the agency’s overall work a ‘security crisis.’” In one case, Collins said, GAO investigators were able to smuggle simulated
bombs into 10 high-risk federal buildings, penetrating the security systems of all 10 buildings selected.
“The bipartisan legislation before us today is the solution to this security crisis,” she said.
The Supporting Employee Competency and Updating Readiness Enhancements for (SECURE) Facilities Act of 2010, S. 3806, was approved unanimously by voice vote
as amended by a substitute amendment from Lieberman, Collins, Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management, the Federal Workforce, and the District of
Columbia Chairman Daniel Akaka, D-Hawaii, and Ranking Member George Voinovich, R-Ohio.
| SENATE COMMITTEE APPROVES BILL TO MODERNIZE, REFORM FEDERAL PROTECTIVE SERVICE Bipartisan Legislation Will Transform FPS |
September 29, 2010
| AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES LOCAL 918-NATIONAL PROTECTION AND PROGRAMS DIRECTORATE Representing NPPD Employees Nationwide |